Wednesday 22 April 2015

Teachers' work life balance and the need of Democratic leadership by Filimon Diamantidis

"Earlier in this research it was written that a more democratic leadership may help teachers in their struggle between personal and professional lives. However, a definition of democracy is needed.  Aristotle speaks about a democracy where the positions of authority are given by lot. Herodotus speaks about the same democracy. This democracy is characterised by isonomy, meaning equality against the law; nevertheless both philosophers argued that it was not a good regime. Aristotle presents Politeia as the best regime and democracy as the "bad side" of it. The development of democracy is to become more aristocratic, meaning that the demos -the mass- elect the aristos who are the citizens that have the knowledge of goodness and justice according to the law. Almost the same is Plato's Politeia, where ‘those who know should rule’. By justice, Plato means the harmonic relation of social groups which secures internal balance, liberty, unity, autonomy and peace. The key words of these regimes that the ancient Greek philosophers present are justice, isonomy and knowledge of the end of existence. Their thoughts on society may be a utopia, but they are the foundation of all modern democratic societies (Aristotle; Dewey, 2007; Microgiannakis, 1992; Petropoulos & Sarres, 2000). Bearing in mind the above, democratic leadership seems to be necessary.
In his book (2005), Woods presents the necessity and the characteristics of democratic leadership in education. Democratic leadership is connected with freedom. Freedom includes justice, deliberation, dispersing leadership, creativity, participation and inclusion, autonomy, critical humanism, an open approach to knowledge and acceptance of diversity. More or less everyone aspires -or should aspire- to these ideas and ideals. Furthermore, living in democratic societies, everyone should ask for such leadership at schools. Let's not forget that there is a double-way connection between schools and society. Schools nurture tomorrow's citizens and society enables schools to have democratic culture (Woods, 2005).  
Stokes (cited in Woods, 2005, p.5) proposes four models of democracy.
1.       Liberal minimalism
2.       Civic republicanism
3.       Deliberative democracy
4.       Developmental democracy
Each one of them has implications for leadership. The fourth, developmental democracy has implications that relate to what is needed for teachers. It involves leadership in the pursuit of common human good and promotes the development of the self and of teachers’ capacities. This kind of democratic leadership protects and preserves the boundary between individual good and the good for all. However, in which way can leaders embrace and promote these characteristics? Woods (2005, pp. 58-62) presents a list of what a leader should do:
·         Ensure there are opportunities for staff to comment on and criticise senior leadership
·         Listen to and engage positively with these comments and criticisms.
·         Encourage and provide opportunities for teachers to engage in shared critical reflection in their own practice.
·         Recognise and value teachers’ professional expertise and judgement.
·         Encourage teachers to take responsibilities, initiate change and take risks (dispersal of leadership).
·         Be attentive to the emotional wellbeing of teachers and students.
·         Reject a deficit model of education which blames students and parents.
·         Create a culture of collective responsibility.
·         Be mediators of school improvement.
·         Help create participative leadership in which all teachers feel part of change and development and have a sense of ownership.
·         Forge closer relationships with colleagues, through which mutual learning take s place.
However, in schools another kind of democracy might be exercised. Woods (2005, p. 82) calls it ‘inauthentic democracy’. In these schools a fake democracy is promoted that tries to imitate a real one. In this way people believe that they have all the rights that are derived from the above list, but, in reality they are controlled, abused and deceived. Considering these and what was written in the previous sections many thoughts are produced.
Let’s start with a metaphoric example. During the previous year a new law about smoking was delivered in many countries. People are forbidden to smoke in closed public places such as schools, hospitals, restaurants, offices etc. The law is right and protects people that do not smoke from becoming passive smokers, while at the same time encourage committed smokers to reduce smoking. All these are very good! However, since smoking is so dangerous for people’s health why is it legal to sell cigars and tobacco? Well, the answer is money. Fewer smokers, especially passive smokers, means less money invested by the governments for hospitalisation and medical care. Additionally, the trade of tobacco is still legal because a lot of money goes to the state coffers as taxes. Something similar happens with teachers. The problem, like smoking, is identified and has to do with increased workload and stress leading to work-life imbalance. On the other hand, although a lot of proposals and measures were implemented, like the smoking law was, results from studies were not satisfactory. Where is the problem? The answer is “focus”. 
Further evidence leads to the same conclusion. Lots of studies like Castros’ (2010), WellcomeTrust (2006), Schools White Paper (Department for Education, 2010), Aspen Institute Program (Wurtzel & Curtis, 2008), IfL (Institute for Learning, 2010), TALIS (OECD, 2009) and others, although recognised the importance of teachers’ wellbeing, when concluding it seems as if they avoided further discussions or proposed solutions on teachers’ well-life imbalance. The focus is on how to make teachers more skilful and effective through CPD in order to fulfil the increased demands of society and markets. The Schools White Paper (Department for Education, 2010) is the best example of such confrontation. It recognises teachers’ increased workload and at the end proposes the increase of skills for the new teachers while at the same time the rate of leaving teaching is high. The whole thing is an oxymoron. Two speculations can be made, which are linked.
The first one is internalisation (Kashefi, 2009), the meaning of which was discussed earlier. There are two views of internalisation. The optimistic view proposes that the investment in resources by participating in decision making, engaging in self-directed teamwork etc. leads to job satisfaction and thereby to increased work performance and productivity level. On the other hand, the pessimistic view that proposes that the system – leaders, employers etc. - manipulates teachers – in fact all employees - into cooperating in the augmentation of workload that leads to increased stress and work-life imbalance (Kashefi, 2009). This leads to the second speculation, which is related with inauthentic democratic leadership as was previously discussed. Teachers believe that the school is “their” school in the way internalisation proposes when at the same time their workload increases. The irony, the dissimulation is that, as seen on the section for leadership, all the proposals lead to dispersal of power in an organisation. The ancient Greek philosophers talked about the “good”. Good is directly related with honesty and trust. If these ideals are manipulated, inauthentic democracy arises.

There are a lot of proposals on how teachers can manage workload. Bubb and Earley (2005) worked upon this challenge with success. However, the necessity of their work identifies the lacking of realistic proposals on how leadership can manage teachers’ workload and thereby work-life balance. This study will try to find the links between teachers’ professional and personal lives, through their career stages, and leadership. The “prevention of the disease” and the “penalisation of tobacco trading” might be the solution. This study will not ask teachers to find ways to control their work-life balance. It will ask leaders to find these ways. The focus must be on teachers as it will lead to effectiveness and good teaching. If the focus is on how to increase demands and results, teachers will not be nurtured and supported, leading to ineffectiveness. The results will not be accomplished.  It is like the myth of Sisyphus, an endless hunt for unaccomplished demands and results."

Part of my dissertation for my MA in Leadership at the University of London, IoE, by the title  
"Teachers’ Work-life Balance – Implications for School Leadership
                   A case study of a Greek school"


Bibliography      
Aristotle. (n.d.). Aristotle Rhetoric (book A). (H. Heliou, Trans.) Athens: Ι.Ζαχαρόπουλος publishing.

Avalos, B. (2010). Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2011), pp. 10-20.
BERA. (2004). Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (2004). Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://www.bera.ac.uk/files/guidelines/ethica1.pdf: http://www.bera.ac.uk/publications/guidelines/
Briggs, A., & Coleman, M. (2007). Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management. London: SAGE.
Bubb, S., & Earley, P. (2005). Managing Teacher Workload - Work-Life Balance and Wellbeing. London: PCP.
Burke, P., Christensen, J., Fessler, R., Mcdonnell, J., & Price, J. (1987). The teacher career cycle: Model development and research report. Washington, D.C.: ERIC.
Butt, G., & Lance, A. (2005). Secondary Teachers Workload and Job Satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(4), pp. 401-422.
Castro, J., Kelly, J., & Shih, M. (2010). Resilience strategies for new teachers in high needs areas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, pp. 622-629.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Μεθοδολογία Εκπαιδευτικής Έρευνας. Αθήνα: ΜΕΤΑΙΧΜΙΟ.
Day, C. (2003). Η εξέλιξη των εκπαιδευτικών - Οι προκλήσεις της δια βίου μάθησης. Αθήνα: Τυποθήτω.
Day, C. (2005). A Passion for Teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The New Lives of Teachers. London: Routledge.
Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Smees, R., Mujtaba, T. (2006). Variations in Teachers' Work, Lives and Effectiveness. Nottingham: DfES.
D'Enbeau, S., Buzzanell, P., & Duckworth, J. (2010). Problematizing Classed Identities in Fatherhood: Development of Interactive Case studies for Analysis and Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(9), pp. 709-720.
Department for Education. (2010). The Importance of Teaching - The Schools White Paper 2010. London: Department of Education.
Dewey, J. (2007). Democracy and Education. Teddington: Echo Library.
Diamantidis, F. (2006). The biographical research of teachers' lives and how it effects their development. MA dessertation, Hellenic Open Univercity, Humanities.
Dyson, B. (2010, August 10). LISKW Library and Information Science In KUWAIT. Retrieved October 28, 2010, from 'Value has a value only if its value is valued' Georgia Tech 172nd Commencement Address Sept. 6, 1996: http://liskw.wordpress.com/2010/08/10/30-second-speech-by-bryan-dyson-former-ceo-of-coca-cola/
EasyExpat.com. (2011). EasyExpat.com. Retrieved 6 28, 2011, from Cost of living: http://www.easyexpat.com/en/mod/cost2.htm
Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-229.
Goodson, I. (1995). Στηρίζοντας τη φωνή του εκπαιδευτικού: Η ζωή του εκπαιδευτικού και η εξέλιξη των εκπαιδευτικών. In A. Hargreaves, & M. Fullan, Η εξέλιξη των εκπαιδευτικών (pp. 175-192). Αθήνα: Πατάκη.
Guba, E. G. (1990). The Paradigm Dialoque. California, US: SAGE.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1995). Η εξέλιξη των Εκπαιδευτικών. Αθήνα: Πατάκη.
Hooker, H., Neathey, F., Casebourne, J., & Munro, M. (2007). Employment Relations Research series No.58. The Third Work-Life Balance Employee Survey: Main Findings. Institute for Employment Studies. London: DTI.
Huberman, M. (1989, Fall). The Professional Life Cycle of Teachers. Teachers College Record Volume 91, pp. 31-57.
Institute for Learning. (2010). Brilliant teaching and training in FE and skills. A quide to effective CPD for teachers, trainers and leaders. London: IfL, www.ifl.ac.uk.
Kashefi, M. (2009, November). Job Satisfuction and/or Job Stress. The Psychological Concequences of Working in 'High Performance Work Organizations'. Current Sociology, 57(6), pp. 809-828.
Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understanding the lives: From career stories to teachers' professional development. Teaching & Teacher Education, 9, pp. 443-456.
Krupp, J. (1981). Adult development: Implications for stuff development. Manchester: CT.
Leithwood, K., & Beatty, B. (2008). Leading with Teacher Emotions in Mind. California: Corwin Press.
MacDonald, R., Wiebe, S., Goslin, K., Doiron, R., & MacDonald, C. (2010). The Workload and Worklife of Prince Edward Island Teachers. Report commissioned by the PEI Teachers' Federation. Charlottetown, PE: University of Prince Edward Island.
Microgiannakis, E. (1992). Παθολογία Πολιτευμάτων στην αρχαιότητα. Athens: Καρδαμίτσα publishing.
OECD. (2007). Educational Personnel. Retrieved December 29, 2010, from OECD.StatExtracs: http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?
OECD. (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments. First results from TALIS. OECD.
OECD. (2009). Society at a Glance 2009 - OECD Social Indicators. Retrieved December 31, 2010, from OECD: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/fulltext/8109011e.pdf?expires=1293790013&id=0000&accname=guest&checksum=9621B3AA6F2B1F740038AC27B057BFB2
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Makes a School Successful? - Resources Policies and Practices. Retrieved December 23, 2010, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091559-en
OECD. (2010, September 6). Statistics from A to Z - Beta version. Retrieved December 30, 2010, from OECD: http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3746,en_2649_201185_46549278_1_1_1_1,00.html
Office for Standards in Education, O. (2003). Leadership and management: managing the school workforce. London: Ofsted, available on Ofsted website: Ofsted.
Osler, A. (1997). Teachers' Biographies and educational Development: A Kenyan Case Study. Int. J. Educational Development, vol17, No.4, Elsevier Science, 361-371.
Petropoulos, K., & Sarres, M. (2000). Πλάτωνα Πολιτεία. Athens: Πατάκης publishing.
Powney, J., Wilson, V., Hall, S., Davidson, J., Krk, S., Edward, S., Mirza, H.S. (2003). Teachers' Careers: the Impact of Age, Disability, Ethnicity, Gender and Sexual Orientation. Nottingham: DfES Publications.
Richter, A., Naswall, K., & Sverke, M. (2010). Job insecurity and its relation to work - family conflict: Mediation with a longitudinal data set. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(2), pp. 265-280.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Thomas, G. (2010). How to do Your Pesearch Project. London: SAGE.
UBS. (2009). Prices and Earnings 2009. Zurich: UBS AG.
Watts, H. (1980). Starting out, moving on, running ahead or how teachers' center can attend to stages in teachers' development. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.
Wellcome Trust. (2006). Believers, Seekers and Sceptics. What teachers think about continuing professional development. London: Wellcome Trust.
Woods, P. (1999). Ποιοτική Έρευνα. In M. Bird, M. Hammersley, R. Gomm, & P. Woods, Εκπαιδευτική Έρευνα στην Πράξη, Εγχειρίδιο Μελέτης (pp. 147-230). Πάτρα: ΕΑΠ.
Woods, P. (2005). Democratic Leadership in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Worldsalaries.org. (2007-08). International Average Salary Income Database. Retrieved June 28, 2011, from International Average Salary Income Database: http://www.worldsalaries.org/greece.shtml
Wurtzel, J., & Curtis, R. (2008). Human Capital Framework for K-12 Urban Education: Organizing for Success. The Aspen Institute Program on Education & Society.
Yang, X., Ge, C., Hu, B., Chi, T., & Wang, L. (2009). Relationship between quality of life and occupational stress among teachers. Public Health, 1(123), pp. 750-755.
Καραγεώργος, Δ. (2002). Μεθοδολογία Έρευνας στις επιστήμες της αγωγής. Αθήνα: Σαββάλας.

                   

Harvard EdCast: A Brief History of Standardized Testing BY MATT WEBER ON APRIL 8, 2015 4:21 PM

http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/15/04/harvard-edcast-brief-history-standardized-testing

Saturday 11 April 2015

What Is Design Thinking? Design Thinking is an approach to addressing challenges in a thoughtful and fun way, where you get to apply the 4Cs -- collaboration, creativity, critical thinking, and communication –- to your own work as you develop new solutions for your classroom, school, and community.http://www.edutopia.org/what-is-design-thinking-for-educators

How might we engage students more deeply in reading?
-- Karen, learning specialist
How might we create a classroom space that is more centered around the needs and interests of the students?
-- Michael, second-grade teacher
How might we create a more collaborative culture for teachers at our school?
-- Patrick, third-grade teacher
How might we connect more with our neighborhood community?
-- Maggie, principal
How might we create a district-wide approach to curriculum that engages the 21st century learner?
-- Lisa, district administrator

As educators, we are designing every single day -- whether it's finding new ways to teach content more effectively, using our classroom space differently, developing new approaches to connecting with parents, or creating new solutions for our schools. Outside of the classroom, schools across the world are facing countless challenges, from integrating technology to increasing parent involvement to managing daily schedules.
Wherever they fall on the spectrum of scale -- the challenges facing educators today are real, complex, and varied. And as such, they require new perspectives, new tools, and new approaches.
Design Thinking is one of them.

Design Thinking is a process and a mindset

Engineers, businesses, social entrepreneurs and other innovators have used design methods and processes for decades to create new solutions for many different types of challenges. But Design Thinking isn't just about specific steps to follow in order to innovate -- thinking like a designer can transform the way you approach the world when imagining and creating new solutions: it's about being aware of the world around us, believing that we play a role in shaping that world, and taking action toward a more desirable future. Design Thinking gives us confidence in our creative abilities and a process to take action through when faced with a difficult challenge.

It's human-centered

Design Thinking begins with understanding the needs and motivations of people -- in this case, the students, teachers, parents, staff and administrators who make up our everyday world. We talk with these people, listen to them, and consider how best to help them do good work. Design Thinking begins from this place of deep empathy and builds on the power of these empathetic questions and insights.

It's collaborative

Designing requires conversation, critique and all-out teamwork. And that's something that might be a bit of a shift, because despite the fact that educators are surrounded by people all day long, teaching remains an often solitary profession. Still, addressing complex (or even not-so-complex) challenges benefits significantly from the views of multiple perspectives, and others' creativity bolstering our own.

It's experimental

When we are designing new solutions, we are committing to trying something new. Thinking like a designer gives us permission to fail and to learn from our mistakes, because we come up with new ideas, get feedback on them, then iterate. Given the range of needs our students have, our work will never be finished or "solved." It is always in progress. Yet there is an underlying expectation that educators must strive for perfection, that we may not make mistakes, that we should always be flawless role models. This kind of expectation makes it hard to take risks. It limits the possibilities to create more radical change. But educators need to experiment, too, and Design Thinking is all about learning by doing.

It's optimistic

Design Thinking is the fundamental belief that we all can create change -- no matter how big a problem, how little time or how small a budget. No matter what constraints exist around us, designing can be an enjoyable process. In short, Design Thinking is the confidence that new, better things are possible and that we can make them happen. And that kind of optimism is well-needed in education.
from http://www.edutopia.org/what-is-design-thinking-for-educators